Well, I don't want this thread to get out of hand so bear in mind that I'm just 
playing "devil's advocate" to a
great extent but I think my example was not truly fictional. I recall a news 
story from a few years back where a
foreign student who did not speak much english went to a house by mistake while 
looking for a party (or something
like that) and got shot for his trouble. Frightened people with guns in hand 
can make poor choices. I know I would
be real polite if ever I got in a fender bender south of the border, even if it 
was the other driver's fault. I
wouldn't have a gun but they well might and if they were angry and perhaps 
drunk, who knows what might happen to
me.

I'm sure that there are lots of responsible citizens who keep guns and never 
misuse them. One of them might even
come to my rescue if I were threatened by some goof with a gun.

However, I am concerned about the less than responsible citizens who also have 
firearms and may well lack the
common sense required to make good decisions.

Randy


----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mitch Haley
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 11:44 AM
To: Mercedes Discussion List
Subject: Re: [MBZ] OT Supreme Court upholds gun rights


R A Bennell wrote:
> Yeah, I suppose so, but I better not have car trouble at night and try to get 
> help at someone's home either. They
> might have to protect themselves or their country if I knock on the door, 
> right?

You come up with the most wild fantasies and present them as logic...
Your mounties seem just as likely to shoot somebody for no good reason as our
cops are, yet I haven't seen you advocating for mountie disarmament, or pissing
your pants because there are armed mounties running around.

Standard USA statistics: When a peon shoots somebody with defensive intent, 98%
of the time they needed shooting, according to the police. When the police shoot
somebody, 89% of the time they needed shooting, again according to the police,
who in cases of police shootings have an extreme pro-shooter bias.

Example: a military policeman (out of uniform) is a passenger in a motorcar.
San Diego cop stops the car and holds the occupants at gunpoint. He yells
"get up" at the MP, who is on the ground. MP begins to rise, so the cop shoots
him dead. This murder was ruled justifiable, when I believe it should have
been added to the 11% in which the cops had no business playing with dangerous
weapons in public.

_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to