True, however, there were instances where people were purposefully shielding their conversations so others around them couldn’t hear. Some were even attorney-client conversations, and the FBI knew this. These were the conversations the FBI wanted, so I think there’s a clear effort on their part to eavesdrop on people even when they’re trying to keep their conversations private in a public place.
At least that’s what the courts are thinking, so far. Dan > On May 19, 2016, at 8:04 AM, Buggered Benzmail via Mercedes > <mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > > I believe the concept is that when you are in public you have no reasonable > expectation of privacy > > --R > > On 5/19/16 7:23 AM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes wrote: >> And what about the FBI bugging the courthouse steps in California? >> >> http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/11/feds-bugged-steps-of-silicon-valley-courthouse/ >> >> <http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/11/feds-bugged-steps-of-silicon-valley-courthouse/> >> >> Dan >> >> _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
