Let's assume your HOA covenants ban possession of motor vehicles with 'moderately severe body damage'.
Questions: 1. Is that phrase too vague to be enforceable? 2. If it's enforceable, is it considered an adhesive contract that must be interpreted to favor the accused homeowner to any extent in which it is considered vague? Now let's assume that one of your vehicles has an original 1965 paint job, and might be described as 'patina', or as 'moderately severe paint damage', but it's a straight rustfree example with zero body damage. And let's say your HOA has sued you for $3k in violation fees and asked the court for permission to foreclose on your home... How many of us have old MBZ with clearcoat leprosy? Is that a danger if you have a HOA? https://www.thedrive.com/news/27914/missouri-mans-hoa-overlords-say-vintage-1965-ford-f-250-pickup-truck-must-go-or-lose-his-home _______________________________________ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
