Allan Streib wrote:
> I think he's in -- there was some initial worry that he'd be a spoiler
> for the Democrats, but I think this time around he's irrelevant.  I
> never hear anything about him in the news (not that I watch much news,
> lately).

Isn't it interesting that we allow 3-4 TV networks to decide which
candidates are relevant? Like RudyGhoul was the annoited one and
Ron Paul was irrelevant, despite the fact that Rudy kept finishing
behind Ron in the Primaries?

Mitch.

_______________________________________
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/
For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

Reply via email to