marmoute added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS
> martinvonz wrote in commands.py:2339 > If you first do `hg cp a b`, you can't then do `hg cp --forget a`, it needs > to be the destination. The "SOURCE" and "DEST" names refer to the names in > the synopsis. I was trying to clarify that that they're treated the same, but > maybe there will be no confusion and I should not mention it? doing `hg cp a b` does not add copies information to `a`, so I don't think there would be confusion from the users. What I find the most confusing part is the piece refering to `SOURCE` and `DEST` for an operation that as no such pair. I would refer to an explicite `TARGET` argument and include some kind of synopsys (at that location in the documentation) > martinvonz wrote in test-copy.t:304 > I'll leave that for a follow-up. I don't think it should be a requirement. Okay that seems fair. Do you think you could impletement that before 5.4 ? REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8029/new/ REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8029 To: martinvonz, #hg-reviewers, durin42, marmoute Cc: pulkit, durin42, marmoute, mercurial-devel _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
