On 29.12.2008 17:17 CE(S)T, Daniel Hermann wrote: > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 03:49:53PM +0100, Yves Goergen wrote: >> I seem to have a problem with this mailing list. Only every second >> message arrives here. My own original mail and the one I'm replying to >> did not come over the list. Are there any known problems with it? > > That was probably me erroneously replying to your address only and not to > the list. I resent the message afterwards to the list, so you may have > received my message twice. Sorry for that.
True, I got it twice directly, but it never arrived here through the list. Nor did my message you've now replied on. > gpsbabel simplifies the tracks so that it leaves out points that lie > in a straight line or very close to each other. I didn't find any > decrease of precision significant for the actual mapping. Okay, so it's a bit smarter that it sounded. I need to take a closer look at that. There was an article about that algorithm in c't magazine recently, which could be what you're referring to. >> Actually, I don't even need to see GPS points. The track line would be >> enough. But I can only hide points for all layers, so I also lose the >> map, way and road points I'm supposed to work on... > > In addition to the "visible" flag, layers could have an "active" flag, > indicating whether they are responsive for any interaction (snap to > points, move). This is a proposal, not a present feature, right? I was first surprised to hear that this would be possible, but couldn't find it in the programme... :) -- Yves Goergen "LonelyPixel" <[email protected]> Visit my web laboratory at http://beta.unclassified.de _______________________________________________ Merkaartor mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/merkaartor
