Dave Airlie wrote:

It seems to me that whatever reason Xorg needs to build mesa for (I'm guessing the indirect GLX software rasterizer) is a mistake.

If mesa is to be built, it should be built within the tree it is developed. That might mean that Mesa should learn how to build itself in a form suitable for use as X.org's internal rasterizer, or better still now that we have AIGLX approaching, that Mesa grows a DRI software-only rasterizer that Xorg can use when a hardware driver for AIGLX isn't available.

We actually did plan on that, but talking at XDC its a lot harder to do than you'd think, as you've got no DRM or sarea, so you have to fake them up..

One thing that springs to mind is that the justification for having a live version of Mesa in X.org isn't as strong as it was in the DRI days -- the DRI tree imported mesa for use in all the hardware drivers, so getting an uptodate tree and co-developing Mesa and drivers made a lot of sense.

In the case of X.org, OTOH, you are *only* talking about the software rasterizer for Indirect GLX. I don't think it's unreasonable to say that the policy could change to make that track the Mesa stable branch or even just to track Mesa releases.

The justification that has been mentioned (you need regular updates to get eyes to find bugs) only works if you have lots of people using the code. Especially with AIGLX now merged, software-rasterized indirect GLX is looking like a fallback on a fallback -- not that many people will hit this path, so the justification for being on the bleeding edge isn't that strong.

Keith


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev

Reply via email to