-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8415/#review14763
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


So is the conclusion that the strict alias issue is a gcc 4.4.3 bug?

- Benjamin Hindman


On Dec. 12, 2012, 6:51 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8415/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 12, 2012, 6:51 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The new proc code has issues compiling on Ubuntu 10.04 with gcc 4.4.3.
> 
> There is a known issue in this gcc version with false warnings of this type:
> ../../src/linux/proc.hpp: In member function ‘virtual void 
> CgroupsCpusetTest_ManyCPUManyCpusets_Test::TestBody()’:
> ../../src/linux/proc.hpp:81: error: dereferencing pointer ‘<anonymous>’ does 
> break strict-aliasing rules
> ../../src/linux/proc.hpp:86: error: dereferencing pointer ‘<anonymous>’ does 
> break strict-aliasing rules
> ../../src/linux/proc.hpp:76: error: dereferencing pointer ‘<anonymous>’ does 
> break strict-aliasing rules
> /usr/include/c++/4.4/bits/stl_tree.h:175: note: initialized from here
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/linux/proc.hpp 6c84a73ab1c4d6893390f96eae15422c21001328 
>   src/tests/cgroups_isolation_tests.cpp 
> 41d6ac9d6331bcfd1e57d403e13a1d27cd5d14bc 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8415/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check on Ubuntu 10.04
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ben Mahler
> 
>

Reply via email to