> On Jan. 30, 2013, 1:55 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote: > >
They will both be writing to the same timeseries in that case. I'll trust callers not to make that mistake, since they could make the same mistake across two semantically different non-metered statistics, and there's no way to stop them there either! On the positive side, it's completely non-fatal. - Ben ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9092/#review15814 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 29, 2013, 12:10 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/9092/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 29, 2013, 12:10 a.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Vinod Kone. > > > Description > ------- > > This add metering into the statistics model. The metering was inspired by > jie's monitoring reviews. > > We'll need to compute metered data on top incoming raw data. The challenge is > that some meters will require previous data: > For example: > 1. cpu_time = 10 @ time 10; > 2. cpu_time = 20 @ time 20; --> cpu_usage = 1.0 (100%) this is 20-10 / 20-10 > 3. cpu_time = 25 @ time 30; --> cpu_usage = 0.5 (50%) this is 25-20 / 30-20 > > > This addresses bug MESOS-324. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-324 > > > Diffs > ----- > > third_party/libprocess/include/process/statistics.hpp > 9e3041a6e2a8ef022eacacad00bc4d974a8e33c9 > third_party/libprocess/src/statistics.cpp > 2fe8af83c6c63a0fa8cb2e9636f9289f0e3d7f2f > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9092/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check > > > Thanks, > > Ben Mahler > >
