> On Jan. 30, 2013, 1:55 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> >
> 
> Ben Mahler wrote:
>     They will both be writing to the same timeseries in that case.
>     
>     I'll trust callers not to make that mistake, since they could make the 
> same mistake across two semantically different non-metered statistics, and 
> there's no way to stop them there either! On the positive side, it's 
> completely non-fatal.

I disagree. We could/should never trust callers to not make mistakes. We should 
(as much as possible) program to disallow mistakes like that. Also, non-fatal 
doesn't mean its correct?

How about, you maintain a hashset of stat names (including meter names) and 
check against that? 


- Vinod


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9092/#review15814
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 31, 2013, 6:16 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9092/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 31, 2013, 6:16 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This add metering into the statistics model. The metering was inspired by 
> jie's monitoring reviews.
> 
> We'll need to compute metered data on top incoming raw data. The challenge is 
> that some meters will require previous data:
> For example:
> 1. cpu_time = 10 @ time 10;
> 2. cpu_time = 20 @ time 20; --> cpu_usage = 1.0 (100%) this is 20-10 / 20-10
> 3. cpu_time = 25 @ time 30; --> cpu_usage = 0.5 (50%) this is 25-20 / 30-20
> 
> 
> This addresses bug MESOS-324.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-324
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   third_party/libprocess/include/process/statistics.hpp 
> 9e3041a6e2a8ef022eacacad00bc4d974a8e33c9 
>   third_party/libprocess/src/statistics.cpp 
> 2fe8af83c6c63a0fa8cb2e9636f9289f0e3d7f2f 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9092/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ben Mahler
> 
>

Reply via email to