> On April 15, 2013, 12:54 a.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > third_party/libprocess/include/process/clock.hpp, line 11 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10421/diff/3/?file=280985#file280985line11> > > > > We can almost kill this TODO ;) > > > > Are you planning on also taking care of Clock::now() at some point? > > Jiang Yan Xu wrote: > Yes. I was going to get to it after the Reaper work. Or is it preferable > to have it done next and committed together?
You can get to it later, might want to make Timeout duration aware as well when you do :) - Ben ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10421/#review19142 ----------------------------------------------------------- On April 15, 2013, 6:29 p.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10421/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 15, 2013, 6:29 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Vinod Kone, and Ben Mahler. > > > Description > ------- > > See summary. > > > Diffs > ----- > > third_party/libprocess/include/process/clock.hpp > be96a68de7257f0ec0a292be1f3357d089397a51 > third_party/libprocess/src/process.cpp > d3dfe806aeb18d495717a07c555bd628d0ee88b7 > third_party/libprocess/src/tests/process_tests.cpp > 562f52c6833183e6e4e81f6ae307cf28e40404b3 > third_party/libprocess/src/tests/statistics_tests.cpp > 6efcc8004fc637e5c4dc8f0ba0e34c0a06a8c052 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10421/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > make check. > > > Thanks, > > Jiang Yan Xu > >
