> On April 24, 2013, 6:50 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/slave/reaper.hpp, line 43
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10744/diff/1/?file=283945#file283945line43>
> >
> >     Can you pull this down after Reaper class. That has been our 
> > convention. You might need a forward declaration of Reaper process.

It was addressed in:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10746/


> On April 24, 2013, 6:50 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/slave/reaper.cpp, line 65
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10744/diff/1/?file=283946#file283946line65>
> >
> >     revert if the above is reverted to Try

See Ben's comments.


> On April 24, 2013, 6:50 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/slave/reaper.cpp, line 59
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/10744/diff/1/?file=283946#file283946line59>
> >
> >     Why Future<Nothing> instead of Try<Nothing>?

See Ben's comments.


- Jiang Yan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10744/#review19636
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 26, 2013, 7:50 p.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10744/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 26, 2013, 7:50 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Vinod Kone, and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/cgroups_isolator.cpp 8b79da50d8fb0c2c8716dd7d2c734b65c32f60b4 
>   src/slave/process_isolator.cpp 6e2af87d291d7c3448393c1ffa816f7020e2dff6 
>   src/slave/reaper.hpp 09844d8d47b143ee369e0c82b19d65a774df4a90 
>   src/slave/reaper.cpp bd3dcef07c370ad338b478755bf8f7ce6408e4a3 
>   src/tests/reaper_tests.cpp 0809c1ff17eb949beb1bdd922fdced022aa202f3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10744/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jiang Yan Xu
> 
>

Reply via email to