On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Bas Mevissen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 07/04/2017 11:53, Esponde, Joel wrote: >> >> >> For this kind of very small issue, is it sufficient to send just an >> email like this? >> >> Or do I need to follow any patch based workflow? >> >> > > This reminds me of an issue I ran into with the same package. It failed > with QA issues: > > ERROR: imx-uuc-0.5.1+gitAUTOINC+3440b11083-r1 do_package_qa: QA Issue: > No GNU_HASH in the elf binary: > '/work/build/tmp/work/bvd3_imx7d-poky-linux-gnueabi/imx-uuc/0.5.1+gitAUTOINC+3440b11083-r1/packages-split/imx-uuc/usr/bin/uuc' > No GNU_HASH in the elf binary: > '/work/build/tmp/work/bvd3_imx7d-poky-linux-gnueabi/imx-uuc/0.5.1+gitAUTOINC+3440b11083-r1/packages-split/imx-uuc/usr/bin/sdimage' > [ldflags] > > I don't think it is worthwhile to fix the source, so I would propose to > add to the recipe: > > INSANE_SKIP_${PN} += "ldflags"
Instead, adding LDFLAGS on the CC should fix the real error. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ meta-freescale mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale
