On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Bas Mevissen <ab...@basmevissen.nl> wrote:
>
> On 07/04/2017 11:53, Esponde, Joel wrote:
>>
>>
>> For this kind of very small issue, is it sufficient to send just an
>> email like this?
>>
>> Or do I need to follow any patch based workflow?
>>
>>
>
> This reminds me of an issue I ran into with the same package. It failed
> with QA issues:
>
> ERROR: imx-uuc-0.5.1+gitAUTOINC+3440b11083-r1 do_package_qa: QA Issue:
> No GNU_HASH in the elf binary:
> '/work/build/tmp/work/bvd3_imx7d-poky-linux-gnueabi/imx-uuc/0.5.1+gitAUTOINC+3440b11083-r1/packages-split/imx-uuc/usr/bin/uuc'
> No GNU_HASH in the elf binary:
> '/work/build/tmp/work/bvd3_imx7d-poky-linux-gnueabi/imx-uuc/0.5.1+gitAUTOINC+3440b11083-r1/packages-split/imx-uuc/usr/bin/sdimage'
> [ldflags]
>
> I don't think it is worthwhile to fix the source, so I would propose to
> add to the recipe:
>
> INSANE_SKIP_${PN} += "ldflags"


Instead, adding LDFLAGS on the CC should fix the real error.


-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
-- 
_______________________________________________
meta-freescale mailing list
meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-freescale

Reply via email to