Hi Mike, Thank you for your reply.
I know there are different flows to program the FPGA with their specific advantages and disadvantages. I would like to know what is the intended, default flow. Manjukumar, as you seem to be author of u-boot-zynq-scr.bb which, according to information on github (link <https://github.com/Xilinx/meta-xilinx/pull/19#discussion_r361995643>), replaces u-boot-zynq-uenv.bb maybe you could address my question? Regards, Adrian On 27.01.2020 08:59, Mike Looijmans wrote: > Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards, > > Mike Looijmans > System Expert > > > TOPIC Embedded Products B.V. > Materiaalweg 4, 5681 RJ Best > The Netherlands > > T: +31 (0) 499 33 69 69 > E: [email protected] > W: www.topicproducts.com > > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail > On 24-01-2020 19:14, Adrian via Lists.Yoctoproject.Org wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I can't find in u-boot-zynq-scr a part which would download a bitfile to >> FPGA (as it was done in u-boot-zynq-uenv). What is the default flow of >> downloading bitfile to the FPGA in warrior/zeus? >> > I use a devicetree overlay and let Linux program the FPGA. Much faster, and I > don't have to create a new bloated boot image for each and every application. > And when the FPGA doesn't program correctly I still have a working Linux box > and can investigate it runtime. >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4637): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-xilinx/message/4637 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/70077081/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-xilinx/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
