> On Mar 21, 2017, at 04:59, Michal Simek <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> You need pmufw with configuration blob in it. Or pass it. This option is
> not supported now that's why it is not working.
I don't understand any of this... "configuration blob"? This is new to me.

> Not sure what's the plan to fix this.

Well, zcu102 may have worked for a while, but now this is totally broken in
meta-xilinx.

> Right now I can run it because I have got some internal patches to
> include configuration blob for pmufw but not sure if/when this will be
> pushed out.


> It was my decision to check pmufw version because so many people were
> using older/ancient pmufw which missed a lot of important features
> that's why we enforced version checking.

If you were able to make things work with this check for >= 0.3, then you must
have it. Can you make it unofficially available somewhere? Or do we need some
sort of early-access license to access it. Because right now, as I said, this is
totally unusable.


> 
> You should use fsbl which contain all stuff you need. SPL is not
> officially supported boot solution.
Problem with this is that FSBL requires Vivado and the licensing. These tools
don't integrate well in a CI build environment. Since they don't change often,
I'll probably have to go down that road for now. Can I get away with just
building FSBL (boot.bin) from the Vivado tools, integrate this file as a binary
asset in my sdcard, then jump to the u-boot.img built using yocto and
meta-xilinx?

Thanks for your help guys. Hopefully we can improve the support in meta-xilinx
over time!


-- 
_______________________________________________
meta-xilinx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx

Reply via email to