on 2/12/00 1:52 PM, Scott Raney at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I guess the next question to ask, is "Why do you think you need show > or accept frame information?" The frames aren't important to us - it's the time codes we're after. Any method to be able to reliably use standard SMTPE time codes would be acceptable (it's not just a SuperCard convention - see <http://www.etcconnect.com/html/service_smpte.html>). -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Multimedia Design and Development for Mac, Windows, UNIX, and the Web _____________________________________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com Tel: 323-225-3717 ICQ#60248349 Fax: 323-225-0716 This is the MetaCard mailing list. Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/ Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
- Re: QT frames to time code conversion Scott Raney
- Re: QT frames to time code conversion Richard Gaskin
- Re: QT frames to time code conversion Scott Raney
- Re: QT frames to time code conversion Richard Gaskin
- Re: QT frames to time code conversion Scott Raney
- Re: QT frames to time code conversio... Richard Gaskin
- Re: QT frames to time code conve... Scott Raney
- Re: QT frames to time code conve... Richard Gaskin
- Re: QT frames to time code conve... Richard Gaskin
- Re: QT frames to time code conve... Scott Raney
- Re: QT frames to time code conve... Richard Gaskin
- Re: QT frames to time code conve... David Bovill
- Re: QT frames to time code conve... David Bovill
- Re: QT frames to time code conve... Scott Raney
- Re: QT frames to time code conve... David Bovill
- Mac 2.3 on server Tom Deasey
- matchText Nicolas R Cueto
- Re: matchText Dave Cragg
- Re: Mac 2.3 on server psahores
- dual platform development andu
