Tantek Çelik wrote:
An explanation is different from a specification.
I would welcome a tutorial on rel-bookmark on microformats.org -- let's just
be very clear that it is NOT a new microformat, nor would it be a
specification.
Perhaps we could call it:
http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-bookmark-tutorial
Other suggestions for indicating that something is a explicitly an
informative tutorial rather than a specification (I'm not saying we have to
always append "-tutorial", but naming conventions tend to be useful,
especially when one could easily confuse a /wiki/rel-bookmark page as being
a specification since the URL looks like other /wiki/rel-* pages).
Conceptually, is there a microformat "rel-bookmark" or not (irregardless
of who is providing the spec)? Because if there is, that's the name
where people are going to look. This of course code just say "this is
defined by HTML 4.01" and "here's how we use it [[rel-bookmark-tutorial]]"
Regards, etc...
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
