Tantek Çelik wrote:
No there is no "rel-bookmark" microformat.
rel="bookmark" is a normative part of the HTML 4.01 specification.
Using rel="bookmark" is "just" using semantic (X)HTML. Nothing new about it.
How do we talk about it then? This is not a rhetorical question either:
rel-bookmark/rel="bookmark" looks just like rel-directory or rel-tag
from an outside observer. The difference is providence.
where people are going to look. This of course code just say "this is
defined by HTML 4.01" and "here's how we use it [[rel-bookmark-tutorial]]"
Are you suggesting we put in a stub page on the wiki for everything we
re-use from HTML 4.01?
(not a rhetorical question)
I'm not sure where you would need to outside of values that are "user
fillable". If they are user fillable and we are talking about them, yes.
If I say, the HTML "LINK" element, there's no question of where it is
and where to look for it -- the phrase HTML "CARGO-SHIP" element will
never appear in normal conversation about valid HTML documents. On the
other hand: rel="credits", rel="home", rel="appendix", rel="references",
rel="title", rel="chapter", rel="preface" ... are all valid reasonable
things to say, some of which come from HTML and some do not.
Regards, etc...
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
