On 1/4/06 1:52 PM, "David Janes -- BlogMatrix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tantek Çelik wrote: > >> An explanation is different from a specification. >> >> I would welcome a tutorial on rel-bookmark on microformats.org -- let's just >> be very clear that it is NOT a new microformat, nor would it be a >> specification. >> >> Perhaps we could call it: >> >> http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-bookmark-tutorial >> >> Other suggestions for indicating that something is a explicitly an >> informative tutorial rather than a specification (I'm not saying we have to >> always append "-tutorial", but naming conventions tend to be useful, >> especially when one could easily confuse a /wiki/rel-bookmark page as being >> a specification since the URL looks like other /wiki/rel-* pages). > > Conceptually, is there a microformat "rel-bookmark" or not (irregardless > of who is providing the spec)? No there is no "rel-bookmark" microformat. rel="bookmark" is a normative part of the HTML 4.01 specification. Using rel="bookmark" is "just" using semantic (X)HTML. Nothing new about it. > where people are going to look. This of course code just say "this is > defined by HTML 4.01" and "here's how we use it [[rel-bookmark-tutorial]]" Are you suggesting we put in a stub page on the wiki for everything we re-use from HTML 4.01? (not a rhetorical question) Thanks, Tantek _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
