That seems pretty open to me. Restricting re-edits or undos is
*less* open. Plus, it's not like it's deleted forever -- it's still
there in the history.
And I don't appreciate the ad hominem there, either.
-Colin
On Sep 14, 2006, at 2:17 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
I feel like I'm having to inform you of basics that you should already
know, Colin. A wiki is the product of a long series of edits, with
the end result the product of consensus reality. To say that anyone
can edit is irrelevant, since anyone can also undo or re-edit.
On 9/14/06, Colin Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 14, 2006, at 1:59 PM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> I understand the process perfectly well, and even agree with
aspects
> of it. The wiki isn't open enough for my taste.
I have to admit, I'm a bit confused by that. How much more open can
you get than "anyone can edit"?
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
