On 1/17/07, M. Jackson Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brian Suda wrote:
>> publication date: 21
>> date accessed: 3
>> date copyrighted: 1 (from OCLC worldcat online)
>>
>
> --- the other senario is to strip this down to the basics for a
> version 1 and NOT include those lesser used dates, then use hCite for
> awhile, see what falls down and itterate?
I'm confident that we could come up with other examples of "date
accessed" use in the wild, as it's very much a requirement of academic
citations of potentially-transient resources, such as web pages,
regardless of that page's likelihood to change.
I haven't seen much need for "date-copyrighted," so I'd second removing
that one from an initial spec.
Yes, on further review, OCLC worldcat uses date-copyrighted, but has
no date-published, leading me to believe that it means date-published,
because they are often the same date. (An interesting table with extra
info about this is at
http://www.copyright.cornell.edu/training/Hirtle_Public_Domain.htm)
So I would also vote to remove date-copyrighted, and consider adding
it in a later revision if necessary. If no-one objects today, I'll
remove date-copyrighted and add a note pointing to this discussion.
-mike
> There was the same discussion awhile about about how to mark-up
> "Fall", "Spring", ... Then there is the weird senario in the UK where
> some Magazines come-out a month before their publication date.
This is the case with many American magazines to which I subscribe as
well, for what it's worth.
-J
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
--
Michael McCracken
UCSD CSE PhD Candidate
research: http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/~mmccrack/
misc: http://michael-mccracken.net/wp/
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
