Michael McCracken wrote: > On 1/17/07, Joe Andrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Actually, date accessed has at least three more examples: > > umich > > ning > > Google > > > > However, they use "retrieved" rather than accessed, > although it is the > > same meaning. > > > > What would be the right way to make the "retrieved" and "accessed" > > labels as synonymous? > > I don't fully understand the question? Do you mean to allow > using either as a class name? I think just having one in the > uf, and if necessary noting that they mean the same thing, > should be enough.
Sorry, Mike. I wasn't very clear. I meant as far as the wiki is concerned. I doubt this is the first time, nor will it be the last time, that the "retrieved" dates get missed in the scan for "accessed" dates. Certainly for the uF, one class name is plenty. -j -- Joe Andrieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 (805) 705-8651 _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
