On 1/17/07, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Michael McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Would <span class="date-published">2007</span> be acceptable, or
>should we insist on the full ISO date?
I thought that both 2007 and 2007-01 were valid ISO dates...
Yes, I was mistaken about how brief ISO dates could be. Just following
existing practice should work fine for dates, it seems.
-mike
--
Michael McCracken
UCSD CSE PhD Candidate
research: http://www.cse.ucsd.edu/~mmccrack/
misc: http://michael-mccracken.net/wp/
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
