On 18 Jan 2007, at 16:50, Ara Pehlivanian wrote:
Yeah except that the spec states that rel "describes the relationship
from the current document to the anchor specified by the href
attribute". So putting "vote-for" in the description would be an
incorrect description. Rather, I think "voted-for" would be a more apt
description to the related link.
Your thoughts?
“The rel and rev attributes play complementary roles -- the rel
attribute specifies a forward link and the rev attribute specifies a
reverse link.”
— http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/links.html#rev-link
Starting with rel:
• rel="alternate" means ‘the linked document is an alternate
representation of this page’
Therefore using rev describes a reverse of that definition:
• rev="alternate" would mean ‘this page is an alternate
representation for the linked page’
With vote links:
• rev="vote-for" means ‘this page is a vote for the linked page’
and reversed:
• rel="vote-for" means ‘the linked page is a vote for this page’
Hope that clarifies the attributes for you, Ara.
Ben
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
