On Jan 18, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Ara Pehlivanian wrote:
Okay, that makes sense. But that also means that the spec shouldn't constrain the Vote Links to rev only. Rather it should be expanded to include both uses and cite proper examples for each. N'est pas?
To clarify, microformats specs don't seek to constrain HTML at all. They only describe expected behavior among those who have arrived at a rough consensus about specific bits of HTML. But you're free to, and furthermore encouraged to, use other bits of HTML as well. Not every bit of useful HTML semantics belongs in a microformat. Maybe this bit does, or maybe it doesn't, but the lack of a microformat should never prevent you from making your own HTML markup more descriptive.
Peace, Scott _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
