On 6/27/07 3:40 PM, "Guillaume Lebleu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we they choose not to follow the microformat process, what about > suggesting them to call their specification a hFormat instead of a > microformat? Actually, this is precisely one of the reasons that a bunch of us have decided to push the POSH name/moniker. You are welcome to use any set of semantic class names you wish, because that's just using POSH, and that's the right thing to call it. http://microformats.org/wiki/posh Tantek _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
