In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tantek Çelik
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
On 6/27/07 3:40 PM, "Guillaume Lebleu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we they choose not to follow the microformat process, what about
suggesting them to call their specification a hFormat instead of a
microformat?
Actually, this is precisely one of the reasons that a bunch of us have
decided to push the POSH name/moniker.
You are welcome to use any set of semantic class names you wish,
because that's just using POSH, and that's the right thing to call it.
As far as the authors of hRelease are concerned, it's not just "plain
old semantic HTML", because they envisage hRelease parsers, just as
there are, say, hCard parsers.
That's the point at which the idea of POSH somehow protecting the
microformat "brand" fails.
--
Andy Mabbett
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
