I don't want to beat this one too long, but I still think that the
"what" is missing in "hRelease is POSH", which makes the use awkward in
contexts such as a launch of something like "hRelease". Maybe the
solution is simply to say "hRelease is a POSH specification" or
"hRelease is a POSH format".
Guillaume
Ernest Prabhakar wrote:
Guillaume,
On Jun 28, 2007, at 5:53 PM, Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
Tantek Çelik wrote:
Actually, this is precisely one of the reasons that a bunch of us have
decided to push the POSH name/moniker.
POSH is indeed a very elegantly coined and catchy acronym, but the
only problem is that it is more a procedure than a substantive - one
cannot say "hRelease is a POSH" - and inevitably ends up being
tempted to say "hRelease is a microformat".
Um, why can't you say "hRelease is POSH"?
-- ernie p.
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
