The way I read it, you cannot say "hRelease is a POSH" (with an emphasis on the "a"). hRelease is POSH but not "a" POSH. POSH is descriptive not a "thing".
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ernest Prabhakar Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 1:21 PM To: Microformats Discuss Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] hRelease Guillaume, On Jun 28, 2007, at 5:53 PM, Guillaume Lebleu wrote: > Tantek Çelik wrote: >> Actually, this is precisely one of the reasons that a bunch of us >> have >> decided to push the POSH name/moniker. > POSH is indeed a very elegantly coined and catchy acronym, but the > only problem is that it is more a procedure than a substantive - one > cannot say "hRelease is a POSH" - and inevitably ends up being > tempted to say "hRelease is a microformat". Um, why can't you say "hRelease is POSH"? -- ernie p. _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
