On Nov 26, 2007 3:42 PM, Ben Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is about making clear that microformats are an HTML technology, > not an exclusively XHTML technology. 'HTML' implies compatibility > with XHTML, 'XHTML' does not imply compatibility with HTML.
It sounds like a solid idea to me, but I'd really worry that it would be unclear that we mean 'HTML and XHTML'. Is (X)HTML too unwieldy to be the global replacement? -Ciaran McNulty _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
