2007/11/26, Ben Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This is about making clear that microformats are an HTML technology, > not an exclusively XHTML technology. 'HTML' implies compatibility > with XHTML, 'XHTML' does not imply compatibility with HTML.
--- i'm not sure HTML does imply compatibility with XHTML. HTML you can be sloppy and not close tags, that is not XHTML compatible. Then HTML5 is not following the SGML rules, so somethings in HTML5 will NOT be valid XHTML no matter how you slice it. (but that is off topic for this thread) > Does this seem worthwhile? --- i do agreed that we should somehow stress that microformats are design for HTML4 and up, this will include HTML5, XHTML, et al. Even microformats embedded in RSS feeds. So anything to clarify the wiki that this is NOT an XHTML only technology is a good idea. How should we proceed? maybe list a few example changes here, discuss the rewording, Then start editing the wiki, when we have some consensus? -brian -- brian suda http://suda.co.uk _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
