+1. I agree with the concern. I sat on a presentation where the speaker spoke of microformats as if they were xhtml-only. I know the POSH concept is there to prevent this confusion, but apparently, it's not enough, Is it? Maybe POS(X)H doesn't seem to cut it, does it?
-- André Luís On Nov 26, 2007 3:55 PM, Ciaran McNulty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 26, 2007 3:42 PM, Ben Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is about making clear that microformats are an HTML technology, > > not an exclusively XHTML technology. 'HTML' implies compatibility > > with XHTML, 'XHTML' does not imply compatibility with HTML. > > It sounds like a solid idea to me, but I'd really worry that it would > be unclear that we mean 'HTML and XHTML'. Is (X)HTML too unwieldy to > be the global replacement? > > -Ciaran McNulty > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss > _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
