In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul
Wilkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
The least that could be got away with is 00:03:23, at which point it
would be a toss up between that or PT3M23S
Both of the above formats are valid and should be accepted by parsers
as a part of the ISO 8601 time/date format.
Only if the microformat in question is specified as using ISO 8601. That
may be the best thing to do, but we shouldn't forget that it's not the
only option.
--
Andy Mabbett
_______________________________________________
microformats-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
