On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 10:13 +1300, Paul Wilkins wrote: > On Dec 15, 2007 9:19 AM, Martin McEvoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 19:21 +0000, Ben Ward wrote: > > > '3:23' IS NOT an > > > abbreviation of the string 'PT3M23S' (hAudio). > > I think you're right. It should be P3M23S instead.
I dont think thats its possible to drop the *T* you could perhaps do PT3:23 ? which seems more accurate > > > A couple of us involved in the brainstorming and after, Myself and Andy > > I think recommended that the duration class should just be expressed as > > > > <span class="duration">3:23</span> > > > > Its enough for hAudio I think and doesn't violate the abbr pattern as > > the current spec tentatively does. > > Will you be contesting the date pattern as well? If the date pattern > is acceptable then the time pattern is directly acceptable as well > through the very same standards. No I do not have enough wisdom to say what is right or wrong. I do NOT however believe that machine data should be displayed in a people area such as @title, I think machine data can be stored elsewhere in a document such as in the <head> in a list of <link>'s or <meta>'s Thanks Martin > _______________________________________________ > microformats-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
