On 12/14/07 1:13 PM, "Paul Wilkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will you be contesting the date pattern as well? If the date pattern > is acceptable then the time pattern is directly acceptable as well > through the very same standards. Not necessarily. In fact, it has been reasonably hypothesized that YYYY-MM-DD is the most cross-cultural, cross-ability, cross-language accessible / readable / understandable date format (in comparison to two digit years, named months, or randomly ordered year month day as opposed to numerically significant ordering) and thus is actually desirable in a global (e.g. WORLD-wide-web) context. Times have not been subject to the same analysis yet. Tantek _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
