In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On 5/2/07, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In message
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David
>> Janes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> >If you mean what most people do by "title", then FN is the correct
>> >thing to use.
>>
>>
>> How does that square with the principle of making things easier for
>> publishers? "title" (or "movie-title" or "job-title", or whatever) is
>> surely easier for publisher to remember, and more obvious when updating
>> code, than the awful "FN"!
>>
>> How is "FN" supported, in preference to "title " or "*-title" by the
>> evidence gathered?
>
>Did you even read what I wrote Andy?
Yes; you asserted that, in a certain circumstance, ' "FN" is the correct
thing to use'. I then asked you justify that; in relation to making
things easy for publishers, and in relation to the evidence gathered so
far.
You appear to have done neither.
--
Andy Mabbett
* Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>
* Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
* Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ?
_______________________________________________
microformats-new mailing list
[email protected]
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
