Scott Reynen wrote: > On May 2, 2007, at 6:05 AM, David Janes wrote: > >> While (very) sympathetic to Andy's point about this, we're getting to >> the danger point of semantically forking rel-tag. I suspect you will >> get strong pushback on this one, because the current approach is to >> use rel-tag for this, and if that needs to be fixed, it needs to be >> fixed and the problem should be addressed there. > > I think we may be extending the semantics of rel-tag beyond usefulness > here. I don't think every open-ended list of grouping terms should be > considered tags.
I agree with Scott on this matter. > Regardless, this is apparently not a point of > consensus yet, and I'd suggest we proceed without genre for now, > intending to add it later when rough consensus is reached, and still > have a useful microformat before then. Could we give it 2 weeks for people to weigh in and if we don't reach a consensus at that point, drop it from the draft and go forward? Genre is used very frequently - we should make a concerted effort to solve the problem before giving up. -- manu _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
