David Janes wrote: > This comment is sort of meta, but here goes anyway... > > When I was designing hAtom, I framed the discussion in terms of > semantic elements discovered / brainstormed -- Feed, Entry, Entry > Title, Entry Author and so forth, and the relationships between them.
This has been done for hAudio as well in the brainstorming section: http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-brainstorming#Discovered_Elements > Note that you're always free to adopt a subset of elements from hAtom > and hWhatever if they have the appropriate meaning. In fact you > probably _should_ maybe even _must_ adopt them. Then the question at > the end becomes "does it make sense to grab the top level container > element/class for this microformat, or grab a new one" Very good advice, we would be wise to be wary of new tags that are not needed. We should re-use old tags if they do they carry the same semantics as the newly proposed tags. -- manu _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
