Scott Reynen wrote: >> Again, Martin is correct - enclosure is for direct links to files that >> should be cached. Most of the examples never link directly to the >> download, instead they link to some method of acquisition (usually a >> buying or login process). > > If nothing else is changing here, I think rel values should be nouns, > not verbs. I think all of the existing rel values in microformats fit > this pattern, and it's good to be able to say "this page and that page > have a relationship of _____."
Could you propose a noun that would replace ACQUIRE? I'm having a hard time coming up with one that makes more sense than ACQUIRE. rel-nofollow doesn't follow what you are proposing. Err, what about 'full-version', 'complete-specimen', 'file', or 'content'? >> Brian, Martin, Scott - if you don't like the method listed in the >> proposal... please suggest a replacement and the rest of the community >> can weigh in on the merits of each method. > > My current proposal is to keep grouping semantics specific to each > individual microformat. In this case, albums could be identified by > something like class="album", audio tracks by something like > class="audio-track", and parsers could simply recognize that albums are > groups of tracks, just as hatom parsers recognize that feeds are groups > of entries. Of course, I still think hatom could cover most of the > semantics of audio downloads. Noted. Your proposed solution has been added to the grouping-brainstorming page: http://microformats.org/wiki/grouping-brainstorming#Option_6:_per-microformat_grouping -- manu _______________________________________________ microformats-new mailing list [email protected] http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
