If you are wanting to save cost's you can get along well with a 411ah.
1-ethernet 1-wireless good cpu.  I have 65 clients on one with no issue.

Steve
RC-WiFi

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:27 PM
To: Mikrotik discussions
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Poor Performance with RB532 AP

433ah for sure.

PacWireless and xr2 would be my suggestion but I don't do anything in 2.4.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--- Henry Spencer


On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Chris Gotstein <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah, probably best option.  Suggestions on a good antenna and which RB to
> go with?
>
>
> Chris Gotstein
> Sr Network Engineer
> UP Logon/Computer Connection UP
> 500 N Stephenson Ave
> Iron Mountain, MI 49801
> Phone: 906-774-4847
> Fax: 906-774-0335
> [email protected]
>
> Josh Luthman wrote:
>
>> If I were in your position I'd get a new antenna, lmr, radio and
>> motherboard.  All new hardware at once.  Figure out what's good safely
>> on the ground.
>>
>> On 1/22/09, Chris Gotstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> That is true.  If i got to send someone up, it is worth moving to the
>>> XR2 radio?
>>>
>>> Chris Gotstein
>>> Sr Network Engineer
>>> UP Logon/Computer Connection UP
>>> 500 N Stephenson Ave
>>> Iron Mountain, MI 49801
>>> Phone: 906-774-4847
>>> Fax: 906-774-0335
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agree with that and I was thinkin that myself.  However we can all
>>>> agree we've seen far stranger things.
>>>>
>>>> On 1/22/09, Chris Gotstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Odd that the antenna would only work well on 1 channel. You'd think
the
>>>>> whole thing would just die out if the antenna was bad.  Unless the
>>>>> noise
>>>>> has just gotten that bad around here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris Gotstein
>>>>> Sr Network Engineer
>>>>> UP Logon/Computer Connection UP
>>>>> 500 N Stephenson Ave
>>>>> Iron Mountain, MI 49801
>>>>> Phone: 906-774-4847
>>>>> Fax: 906-774-0335
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> If it connects on ch 1 I doubt any water is in the connectors.
>>>>>> Antenna could be shot, though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/22/09, Robert Andrews <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> what are your signal strengths?   What is your omni?   Something is
>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>> wrong.   Have you checked for water in cables?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Chris Gotstein wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As far as i'm aware, we are the only WISP in the area.  Our other
>>>>>>>> tower sites are more than 15 miles away from this tower.  Sectors
>>>>>>>> would be my next option, and probably moving to horizontal
>>>>>>>> polarization.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Chris Gotstein
>>>>>>>> Sr Network Engineer
>>>>>>>> UP Logon/Computer Connection UP
>>>>>>>> 500 N Stephenson Ave
>>>>>>>> Iron Mountain, MI 49801
>>>>>>>> Phone: 906-774-4847
>>>>>>>> Fax: 906-774-0335
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Robert Andrews wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You have heavy interference from somewhere else.   Are there
>>>>>>>>> Canopy's
>>>>>>>>> in the area?   Do you have other transmitters in the area?
>>>>>>>>> Basically, when you go to G you are spending enough time in the
>>>>>>>>> upper
>>>>>>>>> channels where the interference is that you disappear to the
>>>>>>>>> clients...   G hops to all channels equally, whereas B spend most
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> it's time in the set channel.   You may need to sectorize...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Robert
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Chris Gotstein wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1 or 2 would connect and then drop off.  I just tried a few other
>>>>>>>>>> channels and the same thing happens.  Go back to channel 1 and
>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>>>> all connect.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Chris Gotstein
>>>>>>>>>> Sr Network Engineer
>>>>>>>>>> UP Logon/Computer Connection UP
>>>>>>>>>> 500 N Stephenson Ave
>>>>>>>>>> Iron Mountain, MI 49801
>>>>>>>>>> Phone: 906-774-4847
>>>>>>>>>> Fax: 906-774-0335
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> None of the 30 connected!?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/22/09, Chris Gotstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I was just going to do that.  Also, when i moved over to B/G,
my
>>>>>>>>>>>> CCQ
>>>>>>>>>>>> went from 80 down to 10.  And when i tried changing channels,
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> clients would not reconnect.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris Gotstein
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sr Network Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>>> UP Logon/Computer Connection UP
>>>>>>>>>>>> 500 N Stephenson Ave
>>>>>>>>>>>> Iron Mountain, MI 49801
>>>>>>>>>>>> Phone: 906-774-4847
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fax: 906-774-0335
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you can enable G, do.  It should help if the clients can
use
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> compression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> With an omni you can pick up oodles of interference, can you
do
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> scan
>>>>>>>>>>>>> late tonight?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/22/09, Chris Gotstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.4B, but i could change it to B/G if needed.  Usage is
fairly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> light, no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than 1-2mb going through the AP at one time.  Sometimes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spike to 3mb.  We are routed, VLAN'd at each tower and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> AP.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This AP is using a 8db omni.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know about hidden nodes, but i guess I'll need to read up
on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  How do i check for them?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris Gotstein
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sr Network Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UP Logon/Computer Connection UP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 500 N Stephenson Ave
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Iron Mountain, MI 49801
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Phone: 906-774-4847
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fax: 906-774-0335
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert Andrews wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.4Ghz?   Running 802.11b?   30 Customers..  What kind of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usage
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seeing.  One of the biggest advantages of the MT is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ability
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what customers are really pulling...   if you are running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> straight
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 802.11b then the max you are going to see through this is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around 4mb/s and if your customers are all allowed 1.5mb/s
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are going
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to see frequent times when they are competing with each
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other.   What
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are you seeing for hidden nodes?   What's your physical
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> layout?  Are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they off a sector or an omni?   So much that this could be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris Gotstein wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We put up a RB532 late last fall to replace a Tranzeo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TR6600.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We had
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noticed that on the 6600's that when you get more than 10
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them, they start performing very poorly.  So, the solution
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that i had
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been hearing was to move to a mikrotik box.  At the time,
we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> purchased
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a RB532 board and have a SR2 wireless card.  Worked great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first month, and since then it's back to slowing down and
we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> starting to get complaints about slow speeds, etc.  We have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about 30
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clients attaching to this one box, and they are limited to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.5mb dl
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and 384k up.  I thought this box would easily handle that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> many
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connections and data, but it doesn't seem to be keeping up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running the latest firmware on the board and am running out
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ideas
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to tweak this.  Any suggestions?  Maybe need to move to a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> faster box?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ditch MT and go with another AP vendor?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mikrotik
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RouterOS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mikrotik
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RouterOS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mikrotik RouterOS
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to
>>>>>>>>>> Mikrotik
>>>>>>>>>> RouterOS
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to
>>>>>>>>> Mikrotik
>>>>>>>>> RouterOS
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>>>>>>>> RouterOS
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>>>>>>> RouterOS
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>>>>
>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>>>>> RouterOS
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> Mikrotik mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>>>
>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
>>> RouterOS
>>>
>>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
> Mikrotik mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>
> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
> RouterOS
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20090122/bbf9c3ac/
attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik

Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS

_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik

Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS

Reply via email to