example: 192.168.0.2 for the IP upstream router router 192.168.0.2/32 via WAN interface of POP router on the LAN interface of the POP router configure 192.168.0.0/30 with 192.168.0.1 as the LAN IP to be used as the gateway for the customer who has configured 192.168.0.2/30 on their router.
Just understanding that 192.168.0.2 can never communicate with 192.168.0.1 or .3 in the real world On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]>wrote: > Can you route the /32 to the POP router, and on the inside of the router > configure it as a /30 just with the understanding that the routed IP will > never be able to communicate with the true IPs in the /30 subnet? > > I have the same issue as OP, was looking at 1:1 NAT, but figured it too > much trouble > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Bill Prince < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't know how to do that. What do you do for gateway, etc.? Got a >> link somewhere? >> >> bp >> >> >> >> On 9/21/2011 12:23 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote: >> >>> I would then break the entire thing into /32's >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Bill Prince >>> <part-15@**skylinebroadbandservice.com<[email protected]>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> There are a total of 7 subs on the AP (new POP). We're currently NATing >>>> all >>>> of them through one public IP. >>>> >>>> All I have in that area is a /28 (16 IPs minus overhead). I have 2 of >>>> those >>>> IPs allocated on another POP that I think I can move somewhere else, >>>> which >>>> would give me the all 13 IPs to spread around if I move the public IPs >>>> down >>>> to the sub level. I guess that's 6 spare addresses for a little while. >>>> >>>> I have requested another block from both our upstream and ARIN. Not >>>> holding >>>> my breath on ARIN. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> bp >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9/21/2011 12:05 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote: >>>> >>>>> Depending on your setup, there might be a few ways. Do you have just >>>>> the 1 subnet, and if so, what size is it? >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Bill Prince >>>>> <part-15@**skylinebroadbandservice.com<[email protected]>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> We are running short on IP addresses, and I wonder if there is a way >>>>>> to >>>>>> do >>>>>> this without splitting a subnet and losing the overhead IPs for a >>>>>> subnet. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have a remote tower serving a handful of subscribers, and am using >>>>>> an >>>>>> RB450 to NAT them through a single IP. >>>>>> >>>>>> We are now hooking up a new sub that requires a dedicated, non-NATed >>>>>> IP. >>>>>> Is >>>>>> there a way to pass through an additional IP without burning a small >>>>>> subnet? >>>>>> >>>>>> Say the RB450 is NATing most of the subs through 1.2.3.122 >>>>>> >>>>>> And I want to put the dedicated sub on 1.2.3.124 (or something). >>>>>> >>>>>> How do I handle the fact that the gateway for both for 1.2.3.124 is >>>>>> not >>>>>> on >>>>>> the same subnet? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> bp >>>>>> >>>>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik> >>>>>> >>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >>>>>> RouterOS >>>>>> >>>>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik> >>>>> >>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >>>>> RouterOS >>>>> >>>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik> >>>> >>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >>>> RouterOS >>>> >>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> Mikrotik mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik> >>> >>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >>> RouterOS >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >> Mikrotik mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik> >> >> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >> RouterOS >> > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20110921/d6491730/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list [email protected] http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
