I believe I understand you. You can use PPPoE to assign a whole /27 to
a tower like we do. You route the /27 as a blackhole. The Mikrotik
will assign the public to the device that will use PPPoE. You waste no
ip addresses that way.
John Babineaux
Network Admin
Radio Communications Service
Crowley, Louisiana
On 9/21/2011 12:40 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
We are running short on IP addresses, and I wonder if there is a way
to do this without splitting a subnet and losing the overhead IPs for
a subnet.
I have a remote tower serving a handful of subscribers, and am using
an RB450 to NAT them through a single IP.
We are now hooking up a new sub that requires a dedicated, non-NATed
IP. Is there a way to pass through an additional IP without burning a
small subnet?
Say the RB450 is NATing most of the subs through 1.2.3.122
And I want to put the dedicated sub on 1.2.3.124 (or something).
How do I handle the fact that the gateway for both for 1.2.3.124 is
not on the same subnet?
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
