or that POP router for that matter On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]>wrote:
> example: 192.168.0.2 for the IP > > upstream router router 192.168.0.2/32 via WAN interface of POP router > on the LAN interface of the POP router configure 192.168.0.0/30 with > 192.168.0.1 as the LAN IP to be used as the gateway for the customer who has > configured 192.168.0.2/30 on their router. > > Just understanding that 192.168.0.2 can never communicate with 192.168.0.1 > or .3 in the real world > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Steve Jones <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Can you route the /32 to the POP router, and on the inside of the router >> configure it as a /30 just with the understanding that the routed IP will >> never be able to communicate with the true IPs in the /30 subnet? >> >> I have the same issue as OP, was looking at 1:1 NAT, but figured it too >> much trouble >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Bill Prince < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I don't know how to do that. What do you do for gateway, etc.? Got a >>> link somewhere? >>> >>> bp >>> >>> >>> >>> On 9/21/2011 12:23 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote: >>> >>>> I would then break the entire thing into /32's >>>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Bill Prince >>>> <part-15@**skylinebroadbandservice.com<[email protected]>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> There are a total of 7 subs on the AP (new POP). We're currently >>>>> NATing all >>>>> of them through one public IP. >>>>> >>>>> All I have in that area is a /28 (16 IPs minus overhead). I have 2 of >>>>> those >>>>> IPs allocated on another POP that I think I can move somewhere else, >>>>> which >>>>> would give me the all 13 IPs to spread around if I move the public IPs >>>>> down >>>>> to the sub level. I guess that's 6 spare addresses for a little while. >>>>> >>>>> I have requested another block from both our upstream and ARIN. Not >>>>> holding >>>>> my breath on ARIN. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> bp >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 9/21/2011 12:05 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Depending on your setup, there might be a few ways. Do you have just >>>>>> the 1 subnet, and if so, what size is it? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Bill Prince >>>>>> <part-15@**skylinebroadbandservice.com<[email protected]>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> We are running short on IP addresses, and I wonder if there is a way >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> do >>>>>>> this without splitting a subnet and losing the overhead IPs for a >>>>>>> subnet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have a remote tower serving a handful of subscribers, and am using >>>>>>> an >>>>>>> RB450 to NAT them through a single IP. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> We are now hooking up a new sub that requires a dedicated, non-NATed >>>>>>> IP. >>>>>>> Is >>>>>>> there a way to pass through an additional IP without burning a small >>>>>>> subnet? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Say the RB450 is NATing most of the subs through 1.2.3.122 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And I want to put the dedicated sub on 1.2.3.124 (or something). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How do I handle the fact that the gateway for both for 1.2.3.124 is >>>>>>> not >>>>>>> on >>>>>>> the same subnet? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> bp >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >>>>>>> RouterOS >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik> >>>>>> >>>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >>>>>> RouterOS >>>>>> >>>>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik> >>>>> >>>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >>>>> RouterOS >>>>> >>>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>> Mikrotik mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik> >>>> >>>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >>>> RouterOS >>>> >>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> Mikrotik mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik<http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik> >>> >>> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik >>> RouterOS >>> >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20110921/56a6cbec/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ Mikrotik mailing list [email protected] http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
