On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr wrote: > Further poking about yesterday showed that SA alone seems to be handing > out fairly reasonable scores, but SA in combination with MD is seeing > hideously low scoring. It doesn't look to me as though I've turned off > any SA rules via MD - bayes, dns and rbl checks are all enabled - but > even after a restart, I'm not having much luck here.
Are the differences in scores the same as the difference in scores pre-defined in SA for use when the calling instance meets a certain requirement or requirements? Ie network test are enabled, bayes is enabled, or bayes and network tests are enabled. The heuristic tests pick different scores for 4 different scenarios. If Bayes isn't enabled when calling from MD but it is when called with spamc then there will be a definite difference in scores. http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html > Is anybody running with a spam threshold hovering around 1 or 2 ? Nope, or at least they shouldn't be. The hueristic tests were run on the basis that 5 was the spam/ham threshold. If you want to raise the scores to tag more spam, add more tests like network tests and bayes. HTH Justin _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
