On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 12:05, Alex S Moore wrote: > On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 12:41, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 11:00, Justin wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr wrote: > > > > > > http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html > > > > Duh. Ok that seems to be the case, and a definate reason not to have > > site wide Bayesian filtering turned on. [And another reason for CanIT] > > Turning off the site-wide Bayesian lines brought the scores in line with > > the other side. > > > > Sorry, I do not understand. Why not use site-wide Bayesian filtering > and how does site-wide scoring relate to this html link? >
Looking at the scores of one of the emails, it looks like for an email that got a razor2 score it got a 0. Turning of Bayesian filtering, it got close to a 1. I dont know why it is happening this way.. I must have screwed something up here.. $SALocalTestsOnly = 0; -- Stephen John Smoogen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645 Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545 -- So shines a good deed in a weary world. = Willy Wonka -- _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
