On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Justin wrote: > Are the differences in scores the same as the difference in scores > pre-defined in SA for use when the calling instance meets a certain > requirement or requirements? Ie network test are enabled, bayes is > enabled, or bayes and network tests are enabled. The heuristic tests pick > different scores for 4 different scenarios. If Bayes isn't enabled when > calling from MD but it is when called with spamc then there will be a > definite difference in scores. > > http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html
I'm familiar with the scoring - and in both cases, bayes and network scoring are enabled. Unfortunately the difference in scores is quite inconsistant, and doesn't seem to reflect that type of difference. > > Is anybody running with a spam threshold hovering around 1 or 2 ? > > Nope, or at least they shouldn't be. The hueristic tests were run on the > basis that 5 was the spam/ham threshold. If you want to raise the scores > to tag more spam, add more tests like network tests and bayes. I have network tests and bayes enabled [and just went through the process of rebuilding my bayes database, just to make sure that there wasn't something odd in there]. The scores are still very, very low. cheers! ========================================================================== "A cat spends her life conflicted between a deep, passionate and profound desire for fish and an equally deep, passionate and profound desire to avoid getting wet. This is the defining metaphor of my life right now." _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
