On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 12:05, Alex S Moore wrote: > On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 12:41, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 11:00, Justin wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr wrote: > > > > > > http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html > > > > Duh. Ok that seems to be the case, and a definate reason not to have > > site wide Bayesian filtering turned on. [And another reason for CanIT] > > Turning off the site-wide Bayesian lines brought the scores in line with > > the other side. > > > > Sorry, I do not understand. Why not use site-wide Bayesian filtering > and how does site-wide scoring relate to this html link? >
Ok here is what I think happened for me at least.. I didnt have enough SPAM in my bayesian filter as the sa-learn --dump magic only showed 155 spam messages. I thought I had feed it a lot more but I think that it had 'forgotten' some. I noticed that a lot of tests have a weight of 0 when Bayes is turned on so I think spamassassin was not giving it the full weight it should. However, since I have shown that I only know how to compile these things and not set them up.. I am probably still on crack. > Alex > > > _______________________________________________ > Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca > MIMEDefang mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang -- Stephen John Smoogen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645 Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545 -- So shines a good deed in a weary world. = Willy Wonka -- _______________________________________________ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
