The first news piece that I saw on this tragic event was on TV. It gave the name of Jet Travolta's physician, the anti-seizure medication that he had been taking, and said that he had two full time care givers that were with the family at the time of the accident. Why does anyone assume negligence? Is it because, as gruff points out, we love to rip on Scientology? Can we let this wonderful family grieve the loss of a son they obviously loved without tearing them apart?
On Jan 9, 12:07 pm, "Ian Pollard" <[email protected]> wrote: > Two questions I've been mulling over... > > 1. The recent atheist bus campaign in London, saw buses with the slogan > "There is probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life." Members > of Christian Voice -- in attempt to have the adverts removed -- have > complained to the Advertising Standards Authority about the accuracy of this > slogan. Would it be correct for atheists to now complain about the accuracy > of the commercial activities of Christian churches (such as the Alpha > Course)? Or, in reality, are said atheists far too busy arguing on Internet > forums about whether the slogan is in fact *agnostic* and what the most > accurate meaning of the word "probably" is? > > 2. Should John Travolta be brought to trial for child neglect following the > death of his son? Reports are claiming that his son, who suffered from > autism, was denied prescription drugs and psychiatric counselling for his > illness (that could have helped control his seizures) because of his > father's Scientology beliefs. > > Happy New Year! > > Ian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
