Maybe in that aspect but I wouldn't go all out on it as a personal
label.
On Jan 10, 9:56 pm, Kierkecraig <[email protected]> wrote:
> How Zoastrian of you.
>
> On Jan 10, 7:18 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > That is good manfraco except that you added the adjective "positive".
> > In that way there must be something to attribute "negative" energy to,
> > which obviously exists as well. Therefore, the representation of God
> > being the universal energy that supports all life whether positive or
> > negative seems more appropriate. With sunshine and blue skies come
> > thunder and lightning. Positive and Negative energy stand juxtaposed
> > in the universe and serve equally in the scheme of things. It would
> > be questionable whether life could exist with the elimination of
> > either energy. To believe in God in that sense matters not, as no
> > one, neither believer or non believer, can deny the existence of
> > Positive and Negative energy. This is the common ground on which all
> > humanity stands, in fact, all living things for that matter.
>
> > On Jan 10, 6:30 pm, manfraco FranktheElder <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Well said Slip.
> > > What you said is the way I believe God might be.
> > > If I could discribe God in my own words I would say;
> > > God is the universal positive energy that supports all life.
> > > Regards
> > > Manfraco.
>
> > > On Jan 10, 10:38 pm, Slip Disc <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > One can still believe in God and not be part of a religious movement
> > > > which usually involves rituals and other devotional methods. God can
> > > > simply be the universal energy that supports all life.
>
> > > > On Jan 10, 3:26 am, "willy minnen" <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > I am 66 and had already several atheist groups on the internet and
> > > > > local.
> > > > > The only mistake we have to avoid is to take over the methods of the
> > > > > religiolics. I am convinced of my personal opinion, but I have not to
> > > > > convince others. If I do the same as they, where's the difference?
> > > > > Where's
> > > > > the liberty of opinion? Freedom of religion means freedom from
> > > > > religion too.
> > > > > I am religion-free.
>
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: ornamentalmind
> > > > > To: "Minds Eye"
> > > > > Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 6:57 AM
> > > > > Subject: [Mind's Eye] Re: Two questions
>
> > > > > 1. The atheist groups that I am a member of merely talk about, and
> > > > > some actually do, having similar slogans on busses in their home
> > > > > towns. Some discuss what would be the best words to use. Overall,
> > > > > there is no ‘correct’ nor ‘incorrect’ to the issue.
> > > > > 2. No.
> > > > > Since I guess people care about ‘reasons’, one of countless ones is
> > > > > that, in this case, all we have at this time is tabloid rumor and
> > > > > innuendo. If ‘we’ start using that as a basis for trials, as corrupt
> > > > > as the system is, it would be entirely doomed.
>
> > > > > On Jan 9, 9:07 am, "Ian Pollard" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > Two questions I've been mulling over...
>
> > > > > > 1. The recent atheist bus campaign in London, saw buses with the
> > > > > slogan
> > > > > > "There is probably no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life."
> > > > > Members
> > > > > > of Christian Voice -- in attempt to have the adverts removed --
> > > > > have
> > > > > > complained to the Advertising Standards Authority about the
> > > > > accuracy of
> > > > > this
> > > > > > slogan. Would it be correct for atheists to now complain about the
> > > > > accuracy
> > > > > > of the commercial activities of Christian churches (such as the
> > > > > Alpha
> > > > > > Course)? Or, in reality, are said atheists far too busy arguing on
> > > > > Internet
> > > > > > forums about whether the slogan is in fact *agnostic* and what
> > > > > the most
> > > > > > accurate meaning of the word "probably" is?
>
> > > > > > 2. Should John Travolta be brought to trial for child neglect
> > > > > following
> > > > > the
> > > > > > death of his son? Reports are claiming that his son, who suffered
> > > > > from
> > > > > > autism, was denied prescription drugs and psychiatric counselling
> > > > > for
> > > > > his
> > > > > > illness (that could have helped control his seizures) because of
> > > > > his
> > > > > > father's Scientology beliefs.
>
> > > > > > Happy New Year!
>
> > > > > > Ian- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
""Minds Eye"" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
