2009/1/13 Slip Disc <[email protected]> > > They CAN'T proselytize without, first, logically, declaring > themselves a religion. < Pat > > Really, though, it is a "Non-Religion". Atheism just needs to be > recognized as such. Would a country be better run by a administration > comprised completely of Atheists or would it present a condition of > reverse bias?
You cannot infer anything about a country run by atheists since the collective term is meaningless in this context. It's like saying "imagine a country run exclusively by people who like tea". Philosophically there's no central, unifying, goal shared by people who like tea. Ian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Minds-Eye?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
